“The most shocking fact about war is that its victims and its instruments are individual human beings, and that these individual beings are condemned by the monstrous conventions of politics to murder or be murdered in quarrels not their own.” — Aldous Huxley
The terror attack in France was part of a broader brush stroke. Syrian refugees are being used by ISIS to infiltrate displaced persons fleeing Obama’s war against Assad as a means of secreting their affiliates into Western countries. Expect to see more of these planned attacks. France was the coming attraction for World War III.
In Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War,” it is said: “Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.”
This is the theory of Obama’s proxy war in Syria first engaged by the Obama-supported Arab Spring. If there ever was a foreign policy, it has all but been rendered impotent by the absence of common sense.
Now the world faces the result of Obama’s miscalculations.
At least one of the suicide terrorists in the recent French attack was identified by a partial finger as a Syrian refugee who crossed into France. He was a terrorist associated with Obama’s ISIS from Syria posing as a refugee.
Although French investigators also claim to have found a passport identifying this terrorist’s roots, I tend to discount passports found at sites of tragedy ever since the Sept. 11 attacks when on top of all the disintegrated rubble a passport was found intact … neither very realistic at all nor credible.
Keep in mind that Obama also plans to bring thousands of these “refugees” as whom these terrorists have been posing into America. Why? It is not for humanitarian reasons. Any person with an average intelligence understands that if you allow people to migrate from a war such as the Syrian War, where terrorism is supported by outside influences (like America), there is danger of bringing terrorists from among their ranks into Western countries, as France has learned the hard way.
It seems that all of the socialist countries have no clue when it comes to fighting terrorism. Perhaps it’s because these “bleeding heart liberals” won’t accept the reality that there really are evil people in the world, let alone that the United States’ failed foreign policy has created them.
Modern socialists — like France’s Holland, Germany’s Merkel and the America’s Obama — lack real ambition to deal with war. Socialists would rather deal with social reform and wealth redistribution; war is beyond the pale of either understanding or knowledge.
What is important for all of us to understand is that World War III is not a video game to be played in some arcade: it is a real plan developed during the George W. Bush administration to begin World War III by attacking all seven countries the war plans envisioned: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
It goes without saying that each of these countries has some resource that America wants.
Bush began with Iraq; Obama has continued the planned onslaught with our indirect invasion of Syria, aiding his ISIS terrorists who were engaged to overthrow Assad. Whether we accept that Obama planned it or armed them indirectly, the end result is that they are using American-supplied weapons.
There is no doubt that we are on the cusp of a world war. The sides have already aligned. It may end up with the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Australia, Germany, and Ireland against the entire Mideast, South and North Africa, and Asia, which could include Russia.
Americans are too uninvolved in real politics and more involved in distractions. “We” tend to rely on the media, which when it comes to social movements and planned invasions seem to forget their purpose as our Fourth Estate: to search for the truth and inform. You don’t fight terrorist extremism by trying to understand their motivation, as Hillary Clinton has often stated. When there is an enemy, you go for the jugular, and you don’t stop until their blood has stopped flowing.
Modern socialists doesn’t have that kind of commitment.
Unlike our liberal brethren, conservatives have a better handle on how to deal with these terrorists, and it isn’t to invite them to dinner at the White House.
So far, one of the ISIS terrorists who attacked France has been identified from a severed finger as a 29-year-old Syrian who crossed into France as a refugee.
How many of these modern terrorists are already in the U.S., and how many more will Obama invite in?
Terrorists have already been caught trying to enter the U.S. through the Mexico/Texas border.
While Congress and twenty-seven state governors have a real concern about terrorists allowed into the U.S. as Obama’s refugees from Syria; Obama makes a joke of security and terrorism, claiming Republicans are afraid of widows and children.
Whether this was a joke or another one of Obama’s Pinocchio moments remain to be seen. It is Obama himself who has created a languishing question, due to recent concerns both at our border with Texas and Mexico and globally, that involves Syrians, their false identifications, and their ultimate destination, raising the specter of the question: “Have terrorists been caught trying to enter the U.S.?” They have!
This lackadaisical approach to common sense has become the hallmark of Obama’s administration.
Evidence has shown that migrants from Syria’s ISIS-controlled areas are using Obama’s lax border control to sneak into America. Recently, during the week of Nov. 15, thirteen Syrian “refugees” were in custody for their illegal attempt to gain access to the U.S. Many were men of fighting age who were using fake passports and identification papers.
If Obama intends to bring Syrian refugees to America, perhaps he should show them some personal hospitality and invite them to live in the White House. Rather, he intends to force the potential for terror attacks against America down the throats of governors whose only interest is to protect their citizens. A more careless and emetic president could not be found.
