Matt Lauer’s right to defend himself is an important part of #MeToo
In the wake of the #MeToo movement, “he said, she said,” is quickly becoming, “she said, he cringed and remained silent.” Another variation is, “she said, he apologized profusely and then resigned.”
This would describe former Sen. Al Franken, who did what he thought was the honorable thing even though many of his former colleagues now regret forcing him out of office (except for former Democratic presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, emphasis on “former”).
But some men — including, as of this week, Matt Lauer — have decided to change the paradigm and started to speak out after being accused of sexual misconduct. There was Brett Kavanaugh, who passionately defended himself against sexual assault allegations lodged on the eve of his Supreme Court confirmation. There is State Sen. Daylin Leach, who has filed defamation actions against several parties (including The Inquirer) for making or reporting accusations against him (what I call the, “she said, he sued” dynamic).
Lauer is the most recent example of an accused male refusing to go gentle into that good night. The former broadcast star, whose meteoric rise included a stint here in Philadelphia and who became a household name as a long-running Today show anchor, was fired after accusations of sexual misconduct became public two years ago. At the time, Lauer remained fairly silent, retreating into a family bubble as he tried to save his marriage and protect his children. The marriage ended, and so did Lauer’s run as a public figure.
That was true until this past week, when accusations of rape exploded in anticipation of the release of Pulitzer Prize-winner Ronan Farrow’s new book, “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,” which details the reporting that helped launch the #MeToo movement. As dramatic as Lauer’s retreat from the public spotlight seemed in 2017, that was the tone of his reemergence this Wednesday when Lauer categorically denied accusations of rape made by Brooke Nevils, a former colleague at NBC. Lauer came out swinging in a public statement on the matter:
“It is alleged that an extramarital, but consensual, sexual encounter I have previously admitted having, was in fact an assault. It is categorically false, ignores the facts, and defies common sense.”
In other words, Matt Lauer is speaking out in his own defense, something that many men have been too afraid to do for fear of being called sexist or misogynistic or other, more indelicate terms that have entered the lexicon thanks to a certain occupant of the White House.
#MeToo has spread the message that women need to find their voices and speak out when they feel they have been abused. As someone who works with female victims of domestic violence and who grew up with women who had been abused by their partners or relatives and never dared open their mouths, I celebrate any movement that encourages victims to tell their “truths” — as long as they are indeed truths. Unfortunately, one woman’s vague, long-buried “fact” can be another man’s defamatory, life-destroying fiction.
That is why it is as important to listen to the men who say “I did not do this, this was not what happened” as it is not to shame women into silence or dismiss out of hand their uncorroborated accounts. We have to find that middle point between the two pendulum extremes of “excusing all men” and “believing all women.”
I think that what Matt Lauer is doing is an important step. While his moral code — which apparently allows for serial adultery — is clearly flawed, that does not mean he should wear the label of “rapist” for the rest of his natural life, if he indeed did not commit rape.
Whenever people are given an opportunity to defend themselves against unconfirmed allegations, whether through lawsuits, public interviews, or impassioned statements in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, we guarantee that our social and legal systems will be as fair as humanly possible. Guaranteeing that right for men, in this #MeToo era, is not another way of silencing women. It is the only way to make sure the truth is spoken and heard.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
![Pinterest](https://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https://suindependent.com/matt-lauers-right-defend-important-part-metoo/&media=https://suindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Matt-Lauers-right-to-defend-himself-is-an-important-part-of-MeToo.jpg&description=In the wake of the #MeToo movement, "he said, she said," is quickly becoming, "she said, he cringed and remained silent."){kind=link}
Well said, as nothing worse then the victimization of the INNOCENT regardless of gender. The METOO movement has value in that it opened up a window that was previously jammed if not completely locked down in some areas of modern culture (like Hollywood). At one point it did seem to go too far, regardless of the fact women have been institutionally victimized with little or no recourse since they entered the labor force after WW2. I would add only one thing as a little slight of humor crosses my mind. I think Billy Bush deserves a 2nd chance as do others. He only spoke his mind and men do have a lot of testosterone in their bodies. However the Weinsteins of the world deserve to do hard time. (Unlikely unfortunately, and that is a sad fact). Now if I dont get nailed for expressing my mind as a man commenting on a highly charged feminine issue, then maybe we truly are making progress. We can all agree, both men and women are equal offenders in a relative context, but women need to catch up in regards to justice, respect, equality, and fair treatment. Let’s hope this trend continues in a positive construction manner until one day it is no longer an issue anymore. The Metoo movement had to get the lead out, and as with other social upheavals there is always that period of intense cathartic release. Onward we go !