Congress could soon vote on the Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act, which would gut America's intellectual property laws.
Congress could soon vote on the Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act, which would gut America’s intellectual property laws.

Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act will lead to bare medicine cabinets

By Wayne Winegarden

Congress could soon vote on the Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act, which would gut America’s intellectual property laws.

The Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act would give the government more control over Part D plans. The bill would require government officials to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies. If the government couldn’t obtain the price it wanted, the bill would allow the feds to seize a drug company’s patent. The government would then license the patent to another firm, which could manufacture a cheaper generic version.

The bill is terrible news for patients. Medical research spending would dry up without strong patent protections. Americans could lose out on cures for cancer and other deadly chronic conditions.

The proposed law would target patented drugs sold through Medicare’s Part D prescription drug program. Right now, private insurance companies design Part D plans and sell them to seniors. The government provides some regulatory oversight and also subsidizes the plans but doesn’t interfere with insurers’ administrative decisions.

Insurers decide which drugs to include in each plan and how much to charge. Insurers also negotiate directly with drug companies for discounts.

This extortionary behavior would cripple medical research. It takes $2.6 billion to create a single new drug. Only 12 percent of medicines tested in clinical trials ultimately make it to patients.

Patent protections give drug companies a reason to make these risky investments. Patents prevent rival firms from manufacturing a generic until the initial drug has been on the market for a while. This window gives them a chance to recoup their investment.

The United States’ strong patent laws explain why we lead the world in drug development. Research and development investment in the United States spiked to $65.5 billion in 2016. American startups attract three-quarters of the world’s biopharmaceutical venture capital.

Patients are living longer as a result. Since the 1990s, pharmaceutical advancements have contributed to a 26 percent decline in cancer deaths and an 88 percent drop in HIV/AIDS mortality rates.

America’s economy is stronger for it, too. The biopharmaceutical industry supports 4.7 million jobs and adds $1.3 trillion to the economy.

If Congress passes the Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act, the government would have free reign to override patent protections. Investors will redirect their dollars to industries with higher profit margins and less uncertainty.

When R&D funding dwindles, so too will patients’ hopes for next-generation cures. The jobs associated with this research will be lost, and the countless patients who might have been cured will be out of luck.

Wayne Winegarden is the senior fellow in business and economics at the Pacific Research Institute and the Principal of Capitol Economic Advisors.

The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.

How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent

Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:

—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.

—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.

—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”

—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).

—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.

—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.

Articles related to “Medicare Negotiation and Competitive Licensing Act will lead to bare medicine cabinets”

Keep Medicare Part D’s protected classes protected

Under Medicare for All, government may micromanage your pizza order

The truth about Medicare for All

Click This Ad

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here