The truth about Medicare for All
By Matt Mackowiak
Like a cheap sweater that can be pulled apart by tugging at a thread, Obamacare is in tatters. Soaring costs of premiums coupled with outrageous deductible hikes have made things worse, not better. All of this was predictable.
Despite being less than a decade old, the law has clearly failed. The cost of health care did not bend downward as promised. The cost of insurance did not fall, and families certainly didn’t save the promised “$2,000 a year,” as President Obama guaranteed. The law was built on a foundation of sand — the faulty belief that more government intervention could make things better for everyone. It hasn’t.
Just ask those who signed up for Obamacare-created healthcare co-ops, of which nearly 85 percent have already collapsed. These nonprofit enterprises promised to bring down healthcare costs by eliminating the profit motive from health care. If profit was eliminated, the theory went, consumers would get a better deal. That idea flopped, too.
Within a few years and backed by millions of dollars in federal grants and subsidies, 19 Obamacare co-ops closed. Today, only four remain, and some of those are also hanging by a thread.
New Mexico’s Health Connections is the latest co-op to run a balance sheet in the red. A recently filed financial statement reveals that the co-op was financially depleted and reported a net loss for the second quarter. State law mandates that if the company’s risk-based capital is below the 30 percent threshold, the state regulator takes control of the company. To avoid this eventuality, the co-op sold portions of its business to a for-profit company. Someone made off like a bandit, but it wasn’t the taxpayers, who kicked in $77 million in loans that do not appear will ever be paid back, despite claims to the contrary.
A common thread over these “nonprofit” cooperatives is that executives were the ones who profited. According to documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service, Dr. Martin Hickey, the CEO of Health Connections, was paid nearly half a million in salary a year. Key members of the staff all received six-figure salaries as well.
Unfortunately, rather than recognize that government intervention is not a panacea, many members of Congress, from Sen. Bernie Sanders to newly-elected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, are demanding bigger government. They have endorsed the so-called “Medicare for All” proposal, which outlaws most forms of private health insurances, eliminates patients’ relationship with their doctors, and forces tens of millions of Americans into a socialized healthcare plan. By adding more bureaucracy, this proposal is nothing more than a continuation of the failed status quo that will open a Pandora’s Box of new unintended consequences.
By eliminating consumer choice, Medicare for All would destroy the one segment of the health industry that is thriving: the so-called “concierge” doctors who refuse to take any form of insurance. These growing number of primary care doctors are abandoning the paperwork, battles with reimbursement, and mounting regulations to treat patients, which is what they were trained to do. And guess what? Patients are getting better service and more customized treatment while doctors earn a profit, all without government involvement.
In a sea of bureaucratic ruin, the success of concierge doctors is a testament to the wonders that can be achieved by free-market forces. Why do politicians seem intent on ruining a good thing? Why are they trying to solve the healthcare industry’s problems caused by big government with more government?
When asked about how to pay for the estimated $33 trillion-dollar price tag, Ocasio-Cortez said, “You just pay it.” It doesn’t seem to matter to her that $33 trillion is equivalent to eight times the size of the current federal government.
The Obamacare co-op fiasco is just the latest stain on a law that has harmed more than it helped, driven costs up rather than down, and chased doctors out of the profession. Let’s learn from these mistakes and correct them by chopping away at red tape, not adding more.
Matt Mackowiak is president of Austin- and Washington, D.C.-based Potomac Strategy Group. He’s a Republican consultant, a Bush administration and Bush-Cheney re-election campaign veteran and former press secretary to two U.S. senators.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.