Atlantic Coast Pipeline will add to America’s energy independence
By Peter Roff
Thanks to technology, innovation, and deregulation, the American energy sector is thriving. On the one hand, we’re constantly inventing ways to do more with less on the consumption side while producing so much new oil and natural gas we’ve become a net exporter rather than importer.
Most people would consider that good. It’s keeping prices comparatively low. The price of a gallon of regular gasoline is just above two dollars (something the naysayers said would never happen again). The natural gas so many of us use to heat our homes is equally cheap, leaving a higher percentage of household disposal income available for food, clothing, and the outrageous insurance premiums forced on so many of us by Obamacare.
Unfortunately, not everyone is on board with the good news. Congressional Democrats are planning to introduce legislation repealing the provision of last December’s tax bill that opened Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration. And the so-called environmentalist groups backed by dark money liberal billionaires are doing all they can to stop the Keystone and Atlantic Coast pipelines from moving forward.
Rather than promote our energy independence, these climate alarmists and intellectual Luddites want to take America back to the days of gasoline rationing, high electric bills, and energy imports. They’re willing to turn their backs on the creation of good jobs at good wages that will support families and communities throughout the nation.
Take the proposed 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which when completed will be used by public utilities in Virginia, North Carolina, and West Virginia to supply clean-burning natural gas as the fuel of choice to meet the growing energy needs of consumers and businesses in the region. The project is on track for completion by the end of next year, which will allow public utilities to meet growing demand for cleaner electricity, residential home heating, and power for local businesses. Along the way, it’s going to bring lots of jobs to a part of the country that desperately needs them.
So what’s not to like?
To the environmentalist crowd, plenty. They’re still advocating for the “all of the above ground” energy policies of the Obama era. They’re pushing for wind and solar and other so-called renewables that are too expensive to build and operate and can’t produce the power needed to do what the plants that will be supplied by the Atlantic Coast pipeline can do easily. The delays they’ve caused and continue to push for are a smokescreen intend to stop the pipeline from being constructed, just like the phony claims about ancestral were used to hold up for months energy development in the upper Midwest.
The development of new energy infrastructure is key to America’s energy independence. Adding new pipelines will be like going from 3G to 4G on the Internet: It will enable us to do more. As investor advisor Ross Gerber recently noted in Forbes, the infrastructure we now have “simply cannot support the current level output in terms of transporting, distributing and storing more oil and natural gas, and as such, it must be upgraded.”
Gerber, it should be said, is an advocate for community-based renewables, but he’s no Luddite. He gets the need, as should we all, for U.S. energy independence as transformational, not just economically but also as a matter of U.S. national security. Too much of the energy we still import comes from dangerously unstable regions of the globe. The more we produce here at home, the less we must worry about the need to appease dictators and to avoid offending the enemies of our allies.
The construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will lead to the creation of over 17,000 new jobs, and that’s without applying the multiplier effect in area communities for years to come. By some estimates, it will lead to more than $2.7 billion in economic activity during construction and the capacity to generate $28 million annually in property tax revenue for local governments along the route, plus millions of dollars in savings for consumers and businesses on energy costs once in operation. Everybody wins.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “Atlantic Coast Pipeline will add to America’s energy independence”
EnergySolutions seeks yet another exemption for depleted uranium
Ratifying new Trump trade deal will secure America’s energy renaissance
