Acosta flap proves it’s time to end White House briefings
By Carl Golden
The ugly confrontation between the president and a reporter in the White House briefing room should remove whatever doubts existed over whether the daily briefings should continue or be scrapped. Not only have these sessions outlived their usefulness, they’ve become so distorted and warped from their original intent they are embarrassments to all who participate in them. It’s time to end White House briefings.
Once thought to be a direct, effective, and welcome way to provide information to the American people by subjecting their freely elected government to questioning by reporters acting as surrogates for the citizenry at large, the briefings have deteriorated into a propaganda mill for the administration and an exercise in self aggrandizement for the media.
The relationship between the Trump White House and the media was established on the administration’s first day by a petty, pointless argument over the crowd size at the inaugural ceremony. It’s continued downhill ever since — surpassing even that of Richard Nixon, whose loathing for the press was returned in equal measure.
The spectacle of the president locked in the equivalent of a barroom argument with CNN reporter Jim Acosta while a White House intern attempted to wrest the microphone away from the reporter offended the professional and personal sensibilities of anyone who witnessed it.
Acosta is the stereotype of what many Americans resent about the media: an obnoxious, overbearing, insufferable, self-righteous, sanctimonious boor fond of the sound of his own voice, in love with his opinions, discourteous, and disrespectful. The long-winded preambles to his questions are delivered with one eye on the television camera to assure it’s getting his best side.
While many of Acosta’s colleagues are embarrassed by his antics, viewing them as harmful to their credibility and professionalism, they’ve remained silent — feeling that he may be an (expletive deleted) but he’s our (expletive deleted).
Trump has manipulated the situation brilliantly, depicting Acosta as emblematic of a dishonest media dishing out fake news. (The “enemy of the people” cry is far-right hyperbole.) He understands that planting doubts in the public mind about an institution or group of people triumphs by singling out the most egregiously offensive individual and portraying him as representative of the whole.
As deceptive and shallow as his approach may be, Trump is a master at it. And neither CNN nor any other news outlet can beat him at his own game, and they should cease trying — it plays directly into his hands.
The historic low esteem in which the media is held and the majority view that news is slanted and untrustworthy is evidence of Trump’s success.
The media frustration is understandable. This is, after all, an administration whose half-truths, exaggerations, embellishments, and outright falsehoods are the stuff of legend.
It is the Grand Canyon of dissembling and distortion, breathtaking in its sweep and grandeur.
Press secretary Sarah Sanders doesn’t so much answer questions as she uses the podium to rationalize the president’s latest commentaries and tweets, quickly pivoting to the propaganda talking points.
The old saw about never arguing with someone who buys ink by the barrel is a force no longer. Social media and the dire economic straits into which it has driven traditional print outlets has emptied the barrel. Trump long ago grasped this reality and has proven adept at turning it to his advantage.
His tweets drive daily coverage, forcing the media to follow his lead while placing significant control over the news cycle in his hands.
The media would be wise to play the long game: pursue story lines; cultivate sources; extract reliable, documented information; and print or broadcast it in a straightforward, non-judgmental fashion. It is a fool’s game to lunge blindly at every morsel of bait Trump tosses into the waters each day.
The relationship between the White House and the media is beyond repair. They are like two scorpions in a bottle: Neither can escape without killing the other.
There is no valid or credible rationale to continue the daily briefings. They’ve become an anachronism, a throwback to a time when the interaction between politicians and the press may have been adversarial but hadn’t yet deteriorated into the equivalent of a 3 a.m. back-alley mugging.
Even should the briefings end, it will have minor impact on reporters or the administration. The White House will still be covered, and the administration will continue to drive its agenda.
It’s past time to spare the public the televised ugliness that has descended on the briefing room.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “Acosta flap proves it’s time to end White House briefings”
Hillary denied! No globalist in the White House for the first time since Herbert Hoover
