Combating BDS Act supporters need a refresher on the First Amendment
By Kate Ruane and Abdullah Hasan
This week, amid a partial government shutdown, senators tried to sneak through a bill that would encourage states to suppress constitutionally protected political boycotts of Israel. Ultimately, the Combating BDS Act failed to make it to the Senate floor, largely because enough people exercised their First Amendment right to protest the bill and educate senators that they should get their priorities straight.
But it seems that’s not the only education that is in order.
The recent spate of bills that seek to penalize Israel boycotts is a bipartisan problem. Many Senate Democrats blocked the Combating BDS Act this week, rightly arguing that Congress should end the government shutdown rather than making this the first order of business of the new session. But four Senate Democrats voted to pass the bill, and many others, including Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, and Ben Cardin, D-Maryland, have expressed support for other anti-boycott efforts, even when they have come at the expense of our constitutional rights.
This week, however, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, led the charge and even took to Twitter to spread a number of perplexing and often downright false statements about the First Amendment and the Combating BDS Act.
Here’s what Sen. Rubio got wrong.
Fiction: Local and state governments should be free to end contracts with companies that boycott Israel
Senator Rubio suggested that not only should states be free to boycott the boycotters, they have the right to boycott them. That’s a troubling proposition and one specifically prohibited under the Constitution.
First Amendment rights belong to the people, not the government. The government cannot impose its views on people or punish them for expressing views that the government disagrees with. This principle applies to both individuals and companies doing business with the state and with full force to politically motivated boycotts. Two federal courts recently affirmed this, blocking laws in Arizona and Kansas that penalized individuals and companies for boycotting Israel. And this principle was famously tested in the McCarthy era when many state laws required government employees to declare that they were not members of the Communist Party or other “subversive groups” in order to keep their jobs.
The ACLU successfully challenged many of those laws on constitutional grounds — just as it’s now fighting unconstitutional state laws suppressing lawful boycotts of Israel — and anti-Communist loyalty tests have been mostly relegated to the dustbin of history.
Fiction: The Combating BDS Act “doesn’t punish any political activity”
That’s what Sen. Rubio tweeted to his followers Jan. 7. Less than a day later, he tweeted that his bill “allows local & state govt’s to boycott the boycotters.” That, by definition, is state-sponsored punishment for a constitutionally protected activity, and it’s what the First Amendment seeks to protect people from.
Representative Eliot L. Engel, D-New York, told The Washington Post that he prefers another bill, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, because, he argued, it seeks to address constitutional concerns about the Combating BDS Act.
That’s also false.
Both bills come from the same unconstitutional playbook and make a mockery of the First Amendment. In fact, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act takes it to another level, imposing criminal penalties of up to $1 million on individuals or companies boycotting Israel or any foreign country if the boycott were called for by international governmental organizations like the United Nations.
Fiction: Opposing anti-BDS laws is de facto support of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions
Not true. The ACLU doesn’t take a position on boycotts of Israel, but it has long defended the right to boycott, which is a proud part of America’s constitutional tradition and protected by the First Amendment. And we’re not the only ones. A number of members of Congress — many of whom who don’t take a position on the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement or have even expressed opposition to it — have First Amendment concerns with the bill.
Whatever your views on Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions, we all should be able to agree that the government has no business telling us which causes we can or cannot support.
Marco Rubio and his colleagues may not agree with the BDS movement, and that’s their First Amendment right. But public officials cannot use the power of public office to punish views they don’t agree with. That’s the kind of authoritarian power our Constitution is meant to protect against.
Kate Ruane and Abdullah Hasan are a senior legislative counsel and a communications strategist, respectively, at the American Civil Liberties Union.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “Combating BDS Act supporters need a refresher on the First Amendment”
Congress is trying to use the spending bill to criminalize boycotts of Israel and other countries
Letter to the editor: Is Rep. Chris Stewart putting Israeli interests before our own?
