In defense of screen time
By Siri Fiske
The Silicon Valley engineers who design our tech gadgets won’t let their kids anywhere near those devices, according to a shocking New York Times profile. These workers are convinced that too much time in front of smartphones and iPads is rotting kids’ brains. Technology “is wreaking havoc on our children,” warned one former Facebook employee.
These parents need to relax. It’s true that allowing kids to browse social media until the wee hours of the morning isn’t a good idea. But it’s also true that smart phones, iPads, and other gadgets are powerful educational tools, both at home and in the classroom.
Rather than demonize and ban all devices, parents should regulate screen time and ensure their children use technology in beneficial ways.
Despite the parental panic in Silicon Valley and well educated communities nationwide, research suggests that screen time can be a net positive for children. Kids whose parents drastically limit screen time ultimately perform worse in college, according to a Swiss study of American universities.
And thanks to their immediate feedback and multimedia features, iPads are great reading tools. Compared to kids who only use books, kids who learn to read on iPads are more engaged, cooperative, and willing to speak up, according to a researcher from the Institute of Education in London. Kids from low socioeconomic backgrounds who read on both books and iPads at home are more likely to perform at or above grade level in school.
These studies show that it’s not the screen itself that’s good or bad but what’s on it. Watching two hours of Cartoon Network is different than watching a National Geographic documentary. Parents need to create straightforward rules for their kids. Regulating non-educational screen time or having a social media curfew are both good options.
At school, educators can use tech gadgets and apps to speed up the learning process while tailoring lessons to support each student.
Consider DreamBox, a platform that allows elementary and middle schoolers to play different math games on their iPads. The tech tool mines over 48,000 data points per student every hour to personalize lessons for individual users. Algebra nation, a similar program, studies click-patterns to figure out when students are struggling and offer personalized advice.
Such “adaptive learning” platforms are already yielding impressive results in higher education. An adaptive learning tool at Colorado Technical University increased a course’s pass rate by 27 percent and its final grade average by 10 percent.
Classroom tech also gives teachers a superhuman capacity to pinpoint and predict problems. For example, a school in Spokane, Washington gives its students online surveys to track how focused they feel, how inclusive their social environment is, and how often they feel like giving up, among other things. Educators then study this data via dashboards to understand where kids might need help, both inside and outside of the classroom.
A decade ago, it would have been unrealistic to expect school faculty to track the day-to-day thoughts, feelings, and engagement of each and every student despite this being invaluable information for educators. With classroom tech, such practices can and should become standard.
No reasonable person thinks it’s good for kids to be glued to their screens 24/7 or to replace human interaction with an app. But the notion that screen time is intrinsically harmful for children is equally silly. It’s time for teachers and parents to stop the fearmongering and harness the latest technology to offer kids a world-class education.
Siri Fiske is founder and head of Mysa School in Bethesda, Maryland and Washington D.C.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “In defense of screen time”
Screen time, selfies, suicide, and mental illness: smash your smartphone
