What happens to conservation in Washington County with the Lake Powell Pipeline?
What happens to conservation in Washington County with the Lake Powell Pipeline?
Currently, even as we are warned about running out of water and need for the costly Lake Powell Pipeline is promoted, conservation is a difficult sell to some. Leaders, unwilling to take a forceful position and make demands concerning lawns and water rates, expect all Utahns to bear the financial burden of the Lake Powell Pipeline until our county “needs” the water and must pay for it.
It’s been shown by 22 Utah economists that water rates here would have to rise significantly to pay for the Lake Powell Pipeline, which would reduce water use and perhaps eliminate any need for the pipeline. Will leaders have the political will for rate increases? Many unanswered questions remain.
If Lake Powell Pipeline water is brought to us – and I assert the Colorado River will not support that – conservation could wither and die, but the debt will remain.
We use far more water than other thriving desert communities. According to the 2011 state Water Needs Assessment, we were using 302.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) in 2005.
The Washington County Water Conservancy District revealed in June 2018 that the state’s 2015 water use data showed our usage at 303 gpcd, the new baseline for future data comparison.
Clearly, we achieved no conservation from 2005 to 2015. This was during a time when the water district warned that we would run out of water by 2020. It is 2020 and we are not running out of water but must err on the side of caution and learn to conserve. Their warning is meant to prompt support of the Lake Powell Pipeline but should actually encourage conservation.
When compared to the 400 gpcd used at the end of the 1990s, perhaps a case can be made that some conservation has occurred but not enough. We are not running out of water now. But as we grow, conservation will be required to extend our local resources, which can support growth to 500,000 and more if used well.
Even the state’s 2019 Regional Conservation Goals document sets Washington County’s 2065 usage goal at 237gpcd – higher than other cities in the desert southwest today.
We have around 170,000 residents in Washington County, and we are not running out of water in spite of our profligate use. However, this can’t go on forever.
Several years ago at a Washington County Water Conservation District meeting where a Utah State University water usage study was presented, our water manager noted that the majority of our area’s high water usage was due to about 10 percent of users. Have those users ever been identified?
Before all Utahns are asked to bear this multi-billion dollar burden, information such as this must be fleshed out.
The state and district use our county’s 50,000 visitors per year and our large number of second homes to justify our high usage. Other growing and prosperous desert areas such as Phoenix, Tucson, and Las Vegas also have many visitors and probably a good number of second homes, too, due to similar climates. But their per-person water usage is lower than ours.
The state and district assert that our district’s water conservation plan is in line with other southwest desert communities, but if that’s so why is our usage greater than theirs? The state and district assert that we cannot be compared to them because water accounting is different. This is a problem that can be overcome by “normalizing” the usage between different areas, which the state and district refuse to do.
If we can’t conserve water now when we are being warned about running out of water and have the huge Lake Powell Pipeline debt hanging over our heads, will we if the Lake Powell Pipeline water is made available? Increased water rates might help, but if we continue our profligate ways while indebting our children, grandchildren, and state no one wins. Washington County can and must manage our water needs better than we currently do.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “What happens to conservation in Washington County with the Lake Powell Pipeline?”
Letter to the editor: Why neither 1922 thinking nor the Lake Powell Pipeline is the answer
Lake Powell Pipeline pipedream is nothing more than a nightmare
Lisa brings up an excellent point in that the top 10% of water users cannot be divulged to the general public for inclusion in water management of Southern Utah water.
In that the water conservancies demand property tax compliance; isn’t this a matter of public information?
Talk about a shadow government operation.
I would like to know how the water wealth of Washington fields has been relocated to the crazy development that is currently underway and who profits in the water move.
If the natural resource known as water is managed for the people of Utah; I would like a better picture of which people, as most of us are asked to pay increased water fees and turn the water off while we brush our teeth.