The illusion of war on terror

This article and its intent are to expose a level of U.S. aggression that has been responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands and rendered untold millions of homeless refugees. This story is still ongoing, and there appears to be no reversal of our involvement. In fact, the following evidence affirms the U.S. is involved in the illusion of war on terror and is not actually fighting terrorism but supporting it.

This is the factual story of a real-life conspiracy to control the oil and gas reserves of the world offered with evidence that can not be ignored or disputed by any rational being.

What I am about to disclose may be hard for some to believe; it has so angered our government officials that Julian Assage and Edward Snowden are now enemies of the state, living in a self-imposed exile—and for good reason. They have exposed a level of treason by the elected administrators of our government in the highest offices who may believe they are doing what is right for America; but their callous indifference to human life and suffering will yet be the downfall of our county.

Who are the real enemies of America?

Who are the real terrorists?

Is it the Muslims that the U.S. has provoked because they have resources we want? Or are we the real enemy? Evidence is coming out faster than we can absorb, and the only speculation at present is about who the real puppeteers are.

Always be mindful of Wall Street’s reach, which derives a secret profit from wars from the increase in the value of those companies that provide the mechanisms of battle. The Wall Street bankers generally hold blocks of shares in these blue chip companies. So they receive the benefit of their profits as dividends. So in war, everyone wins but us.

We are the pawns of war.

Bush and Obama have so inflamed the Arab nations that we are on the cusp of WW III. As you read further, you will understand why.

We know about Iraq and Afghanistan, but the question posed by this article is “Why Syria? Why the war?” It’s a nothing country that we are told has abused its citizens sufficiently to require a regime change and has little oil for the U.S. to covet. Is this more propaganda? What is the real reason for our causing the unrest and the Syrian “civil” war? And why has Putin joined the conflict on the side of Assad and against the U.S?

The real reason for the Syrian war will surprise you, and it’s similar to the reason for the war in Afghanistan. There is a pipeline that the U.S. and several states wanted to build: a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline to run across several states and through Syria.

Assad said “No” as Unocal negotiated in Afghanistan for another pipeline. Assad also held firm while the Syrian war became a geopolitical competition to control Mideastern, North African, and Central Asian gas pipelines.

Evidence from the highest source verifies the truth of this claim. Retired NATO Secretary General Wesley Clark disclosed the existence of a memo from the Office of the U.S. Secretary of Defense just a few weeks after 9/11 revealed plans to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and moving on to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. In a subsequent interview, Clark says, “… this strategy is fundamentally about control of the region’s vast oil and gas resources.”

The Bush-Cheney administration began with the invasion of Iraq. Obama, following the plan, has secretly invaded Syria and disrupted governments in other states through his allied ISIS and al-Qaida affiliation and finances. The only missing piece of the puzzle is who is pulling their strings.

A 2008 U.S. Army-funded RAND report, stated:

This was actually a U.S. ploy to one-up Russia. Assad wouldn’t sign an agreement with Qatar that would run a pipeline through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Syria and on to Turkey to supply European markets, bypassing Russia. Assad’s interest in refusing to sign the agreement was to protect the interests of Russia, Assad’s ally and Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.

Is there any wonder why Russia has now entered the civil war on the side of Assad? And if no one has noticed, Putin is going after Obama’s financed and supported ISIS in Syria.

Both Obama and the U.K. have denied their real purpose even as this 2012 document provided a glimpse of its reality.

Assad’s mistake was to unwaveringly refuse to cooperate in developing a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline to run across several states and through Syria.

The U.S. had to depose Assad, who for years has stood in its way, thus Obama’s real political goal: depose Syria’s President Assad.

But how to depose Assad without direct conflict ?

Recent declassified documents confirm what was already known: “ISIS” is another creation of U.S. intelligence. The Obama Administration is not only behind the Islamic State (ISIS) but, at the same time, is behind the allegedly “moderate” al-Qaida terrorists, which the Obama Administration is supporting as part of America’s campaign against the Islamic State (ISIS).

Yes, you read that right. Obama is supporting both sides of terrorists in our “War on Terrorism.” But our war is really a terrorist act itself. We are attempting to plunder Syria for control of a pipeline. We are the real terrorists in the Middle East.

I want to be clear here. ISIS is a creation of U.S. Intelligence, which supports terrorist groups ISIS and al-Qaida to bring Bashar al-Assad and his government down. It was a conscious agenda to depose the Syrian leader.

The U.S. counter-terrorism mandate is fiction. America is the number one state sponsor of terrorism. In support of this, consider the following.

A former director of the National Security Agency, Lt. General William Odom, said, “By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism—in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.”

The Islamic State is protected by the U.S. and its allies. If we had really wanted to eliminate their brigades, we could have carpet-bombed their Toyota pick-up truck convoys any time we wanted.

The advance of ISIS in Iraq and Syria is considered by most Muslims to be a U.S. undertaking.

The Obama Administration as disclosed by WikiLeaks originally viewed Bashar al-Assad as a reformer and sought to court Assad and being him into our fold. We wanted the pipeline.

The U.S. and Assad were reflectively on the same page, even while the U.S. was deceptive and had instigated and armed the Syrian uprising. When Assad ordered mass crackdowns and military sieges on the U.S.-backed and inspired Arab Spring protesters, it was the catalyst that led to the full U.S.-backed Syrian Civil War. All Assad wanted were normalized relations with the U.S. and the Bush-imposed sanctions lifted. We wanted the pipeline.

The U.S. and NATO have been the sponsors of regime change to affect a common agenda, such as in the destruction of Yugoslavia and the Arab Spring, which has been repeated in a dozen countries—known as “Color Revolutions”—including the Ukraine where the CIA had invested considerable resources to overthrow the government before Putin stepped in. Putin may well be the good guy against Obama, the repose dictator.

The CIA and its George Soros-financed nongovernmental organization have been the primary movers in this plot and are responsible for the Arab Spring uprisings across the region.

ISIS and al-Nusra (an al-Qaida affiliate) are protected by a Western military alliance; both al-Qaida entities are being used to destroy Syria and Iraq. The air campaign against ISIS allegedly does not in fact target ISIS. It targets Syria and Iraq: schools, hospitals, factories, residential areas, government buildings, roads, and bridges. Al-Nusra is considered by the Obama Administration as, if you can believe it, “moderate opposition.” There is no such thing as a moderate terrorist!

More telling is the fact the U.S. admits its role in supporting the rise of ISIS in Syria and al-Qaida in Iraq. This admission is more of a concern because the U.S. and the U.K. actually wanted ISIS and al-Qaida to take control of Syria and Iraq to counter Iran and Syria’s Shia movements. Yet none of our traditional news sources have exposed this political corruption. This information has remained hidden by most American news sources.

Obama actually intended to create a “Salafist principality” in eastern Syria while also creating an al-Qaida-controlled Islamic state in both Syria and Iraq.

We created an enemy, and real people are being killed and maimed by it. Meanwhile, Obama has no problem playing golf. Or acting like a real president. He lacks human compassion for the needless slaughter he has heaped upon the Middle East.

In other words, and to be clear, the U.S. and the U.K. were supporting the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad and wanted a “declared or undeclared Salafist principality.” The U.S. and U.K. agreed to support ISIS and al-Qaida in order to bring Assad down. Once removed, Assad would no longer be a threat to the West’s pipe dream.

It is axiomatic that al-Qaida did not exist in Iraq until the U.S. and U.K. invasion. There is no longer any question that the U.S. has exploited the existence of ISIS against other states in the region. This has been part of a wider agenda to maintain Western control. But this author questions the right to control other nation’s government when we can’t even control our own here in the U.S., which by all accounts is no longer manageable.

In Ukraine, the democratically-elected government of President Viktor Yanukovych was a target and fell more quickly than either Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak or Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

This fall came about because the Western media fully cooperated in Five Eyes: originally a five-nation joint intelligence treaty for joint cooperation in signals intelligence, now expanded.

The Strategic Culture Foundation gives us insight into the propaganda program to activate proxy armies that use aliases to disseminate anti-Yanukovych propaganda. Assisted by the global corporate news media, they “pushed stories,” knowing that they were false.

In the case of Ukraine, the “pushed stories” were products of propaganda mills under the direction of the CIA, NSA, GCHQ, British MI6, and Communications Security Establishment Canada. They worked closely with intelligence agency fronts such as Soros’s Open Society Institute, Freedom House, Hudson Institute, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Heritage Foundation, and Demos of the UK.

In fact, spies and provocateurs were discovered filing phony news reports from Ukraine and from Venezuela during simultaneous anti-government rioting. Fake journalists with planted stories were exposed in Egypt, Thailand, China, and Russia. But our real journalists are no better: all the government needs do is hand them a prepared script, and they will read it on the air.

The Obama administration has been playing a very dangerous game of regime change involving the leaders of a country, often elected, simply because our leaders want someone in power they can control. Accordingly, the U.S. has raised an army of terrorists that not only hates us but is bent on our complete destruction as a people. Ultimately, this agenda can only end in a final conflict.

Lesson learned, the media cannot be trusted to inform nor to provide news that is either uncensored or accurate. Our media are a part and parcel of the administration they support. And more importantly, they are puppets, like our officials elected by their financial backers from Wall Street.

An even more serious question is raised by this article, which is also a condemnation of our Fourth Estate: Why are the traditional news sources afraid to report political corruption that goes to the very heart of our republic and information we have a right to know? Does Obama have so much sway over the media that that they fear reprisal?

The shameful reality is that a U.S. president who commits our military to invasion under false pretext can not be held accountable for the deaths and injury to either Americans or those injured in the invaded country. He gets a free pass for the destruction and loss of life he causes.

I am reminded of this quote by George Bernard Shaw: “Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few.” Surely this is the agenda of the Obama administration in maintaining the illusion of war on terror.