Planned Parenthood firing a reminder of its true mission
I’ve often been a critic of Planned Parenthood, because I believe that despite its arguments to the contrary, the organization is primarily a political tool for the abortion industry. Those who support Planned Parenthood are quick with the statistics about how they provide counseling, general checkups and health care, mammogram referrals and other female-centric health services.
Supporters say that abortion is just a small percentage of the services Planned Parenthood provides. I never believed that, but many people do.
But the firing of Leana Wen last week, the first physician to head the organization in 50 years, is a sure sign that the organization defines women’s health as access to abortion, and all the rest is secondary. Firing a physician whose goal was to advance health care for women (which, yes, probably includes abortion) is indicative of an extreme mind-set that sees access to abortion as more important than cancer detection, avoidance of sexually transmitted diseases, services to expectant mothers, and all the other unique and specific services that are designed to improve and protect women’s health.
I’m glad that Planned Parenthood made this move, because it underscores something I have always known: that the organization doesn’t actually focus on women’s health.
This reminds me of recent events in Philadelphia when state Rep. Brian Sims gave the pro-life movement a jolt of energy when he posted videos of himself harassing a woman praying the rosary and two teenage girls in front of the Planned Parenthood on Locust Street. The video went viral, emboldening hundreds of pro-life supporters to take to the streets to rally against Sims’ comments.
Just like Sims’ comments gave the pro-choice movement a black eye, the same is true when it comes for the firing of Dr. Wen. It is moves like this that advance the cause of those who want to defund Planned Parenthood. In turning its back on a more holistic view of health and focusing in a single-minded way on access to abortion, the organization has shown itself to be nothing more than a political lobbying group that does not deserve federal funds.
It will be hard, going forward, for the organization to pretend it is anything more than an advocacy group for abortion rights. And that’s OK, since there have always been groups that lobby for one particular cause, to the exclusion of all others. The National Rifle Association never pretended to advocate for criminal justice reform. The American Bar Association never pretended to defend the rights of doctors sued for malpractice. And groups like NARAL Pro Choice America have always, and only, been about protecting access to abortion.
So Planned Parenthood should just give up the charade about women’s health, and declare itself to be what it always has been: a federally funded lobbyist for abortion.
The truth shall set them free … from our federal dollars.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
