Why more prosecutors should be erasing marijuana convictions
By Taylor Pendergrass
It has taken decades, billions of dollars, and thousands of laws to turn the United States into the largest incarcerator in the world. This system also imposes on millions of people harsh, unfair, and long-lasting consequences for having a criminal record. But it’s within the power of local prosecutors to start dismantling this machine — even without changing a single law.
San Francisco’s District Attorney, George Gascón, is showing the way. Last week, he announced that his office would erase thousands of marijuana convictions from people’s criminal records and automatically review thousands more dating back to 1975 to see if those convictions should be downgraded.
Explaining the decision, Gascón said, “We want to address the wrongs that were caused by the failures of the war on drugs for many years in this country and begin to fix some of the harm that was done not only to the entire nation but specifically to communities of color.”
Black people are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana use as compared with whites, despite similar rates of usage. Steps like this one are essential as we work to combat the perverse racial disparities in our criminal justice system.
Like almost all prosecutors in America, Gascón is an elected official. His decision to take steps to address the lasting damage caused by ineffective and racist drug arrests is consistent with the will of California voters who supported a 2016 ballot measure legalizing marijuana.
Gascón’s decision is also consistent with the values of mainstream voters across the United States. Last year, the ACLU conducted a national poll that revealed strong bipartisan and geographically diverse support for prosecutors who are committed to reducing mass incarceration and racial bias in the criminal justice system. Among those surveyed, 91 percent said that they believe it is important for a prosecutor to prioritize reducing unequal treatment of individuals because of race.
For decades, prosecutors have used their power to pack jails and prisons. Voters have the power to put more prosecutors like Gascón into office and to ensure that prosecutors are held accountable for reducing incarceration and addressing racial disparities throughout the criminal justice system.
Prosecutors should understand that reforming the broken criminal justice system is good policy as well as good politics. The ACLU’s Campaign for Smart Justice, a national non-partisan voter education initiative, aims to educate voters about the power and importance of their local prosecutor. In Philadelphia last year, the campaign worked alongside many other groups, knocking on doors and educating voters who ultimately elected Larry Krasner as their top prosecutor, a former civil rights attorney committed to criminal justice reform.
Likewise, voters in Dallas will soon decide whether and how they want their next district attorney, in the state with the biggest prison population in the country, to carry out criminal justice reforms.
New district attorneys can have enormous power to reduce incarceration, fix the nation’s broken bail system, and ensure people are no longer jailed just because they are poor.
Taylor Pendergrass is a senior campaign strategist for ACLU Campaign for Smart Justice.
The viewpoints expressed above do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
Articles related to “Why more prosecutors should be erasing marijuana convictions”
Mesquite City Council passes library land transfer, gaming license, medical marijuana tax reduction
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
