Second Amendment sanctuary counties: “We will not comply”
As urban areas are pushing for more gun controls, rural areas are mounting an equal amount of resistance, citizens even posting “we will not comply” signs. So far, the battle is largely confined to western counties but spreading eastward as at least 179 counties now designate themselves as Second Amendment sanctuary counties. State sheriff associations are driving the issue for four primary reasons: it’s unconstitutional, it violates due process, it’s unenforceable, and it does nothing to protect law abiding citizens. Most probably see it also as a back door to eventual gun confiscation.
So what does it matter what sheriffs think?
Sheriffs are the only elected law enforcement agents in the United States, and each must swear an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution to hold that trusted office. They understand that Congress has sole authority to make law, that law must originate with and be approved by both the House and Senate (535 individuals), and that the only power belonging to the president is to execute that law, suggest through his state of the union address, and sign or veto, which can be overridden.
These 535 make federal law, not just a single person, as is the case with kings and dictators. All executive orders that have the effect of law are unconstitutional. Presidents doing so undermine the relevancy of the Congress, and it’s a form of tyranny. Moreover, it is well to remember that a law cannot undo an amendment to the Constitution — only another amendment can do that, and that requires the support of three quarters of the states, so Congress is restricted also.
Presently, 29 out of 33 counties in New Mexico have opted for Second Amendment sanctuary status together with a majority in Colorado of 38 of 64; in Illinois, 64 of 102; and in Washington, 24 of 39. States with fewer sanctuaries counties include Oregon with 13 of 36, Maryland with 3 of 23, Nevada with 5 of 16, North Carolina with 1 of 100, Rhode Island with 5 of 31, and Tennessee with 2 of 95, thus totaling 179. In New York, an additional 52 of 62 counties officially oppose the state’s Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement Act of 2013, but they have not yet sought Second Amendment sanctuary status.
And there exist three Second Amendment sanctuary states: Alaska, Idaho, and Kansas, so a proper tally would include all counties in these states. Moreover, Missouri is poised to become the fourth.
These came into existence from the Sheriff’s Rebellion of 2013 when President Barack Obama, failing to get Congress to initiate his anti-Second Amendment agenda, signed 23 executive orders Jan. 16, bypassing Congress. By Feb. 14, 2013 nine state sheriff associations and 336 elected county sheriffs had signed pledges to defend their citizens from either Barack Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders or any gun legislation coming out of Congress that, in effect, damaged this constitutional amendment. The states refusing to comply were, as they came on board, Utah, Florida, Georgia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nebraska, Wyoming, Indiana, and Illinois.
Even the California State Sheriffs Association’s letter to Vice President Joe Biden was stronger than expected, putting him and the federal government on notice: “It is the position of CSSA, in accordance with the Constitution of the United States and the statutes of the State of California, that law-abiding persons who meet the established requirements have the right to acquire, own, possess, use, keep and bear firearms. This right shall not be infringed.”
The Utah Sheriff’s letter, aimed directly at President Obama, was the most blunt: “We respect the Office of the President of the United States of America. But, make no mistake, as the duly-elected sheriffs of our respective counties, we will enforce the rights guaranteed to our citizens by the Constitution. No federal official will be permitted to descend upon our constituents and take from them what the Bill of Rights — in particular Amendment II — has given them. We, like you, swore a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and we are prepared to trade our lives for the preservation of its traditional interpretation.”
Wyoming made clear what would happen to federal agents attempting to enforce their alterations of the amendment. It passed the Firearm Protection Act, which threatened federal officials with up to five years in prison and $5,000 in fines if convicted of attempting to enforce unconstitutional statutes or decrees infringing on the gun rights of Wyoming citizens. Reportedly, Missouri and Texas had similar legislation pending.
The Obama Administration backed down.
As mentioned, in 2013 the states of Kansas, Alaska, and Idaho declared themselves Second Amendment sanctuary states. These are some of the words Kansas passed into law: “Any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States which violates the second amendment to the constitution of the United States is null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas.”
Today’s threat to the Second Amendment is not presently coming from the federal government but from state governments and politicians largely from urban areas. The Sheriff Rebellion of 2019 is county against state. Sheriffs are once again placed in the position, “Will I obey the law when such violates the Constitution, which I swore by oath to defend? No!” Thank God they see and understand, their duty.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “Second Amendment sanctuary counties: ‘We will not comply'”
Barr, like Holder, gets contempt citation, but there are big differences
Imagine a Dem wins the Presidency in 2020. Imagine the Senate becomes run by a Dem majority in 2020. Imagine the House remains Dem. Then imagine the 2nd Ammendment being stripped down by Federal legislation within months.. IMAGINE. Sit at home, watch your TV. Go to work. Play around on Facebook and YouTube while they continue to censor free speech. Go to Church. Whatever you do, ignore politics. Ignore getting involved. Ignore it all. Be Good nice agreeable Soviet Americans.