The STRONGER Patents Act will boost family businesses
By Dick Patten
Which company is more innovative: a corporate giant or a family-owned business?
More often than not, it’s the family-owned firm. A recent study found that for every dollar invested in research and development, family businesses generate more patents, new products, and revenues than their non-family-owned peers. These companies drive economic growth and support millions of jobs.
Unfortunately, family firms face serious headwinds. Across the nation, courts are undermining firms’ property rights, making it difficult for families to sustain their businesses. Congress can safeguard family firms’ property rights by passing the STRONGER Patents Act.
The right to own property — whether it’s land, a business, or an idea for an invention — has been central to Western culture ever since 25 barons and the King of England signed the Magna Carta in 1215. The document explicitly prohibited the king from appropriating another person’s property.
The miracles of modern capitalism, from iPhones to cutting-edge medicines, wouldn’t be possible without strong property rights — especially patents.
Without intellectual property protections, any rival could create knock-off copies of a smartphone or a drug formula. These rivals could undercut innovators, who spend enormous sums of money to turn their ideas into marketable products. Soon, nobody would spend money on research and development, since rivals could simply steal the fruits of their labor.
Intellectual property drives the economy. Intellectual-property-intensive industries comprise 38 percent of our GDP and support nearly 58 million American jobs. Intellectual-property-related service exports have increased by more than 80 percent over the last two decades, totaling $130 billion in 2014.
Unfortunately, there are plenty of firms that try to infringe on innovators’ intellectual property. And many of them get away with this theft because innovators — especially smaller family-owned firms — lack the legal resources to halt this infringement in court.
The STRONGER Patents Act would fix this problem.
The bill, officially the Support Technology & Research for Our Nation’s Growth and Economic Resilience Patents Act, affirms that patents are a form of property. This means that patent owners can ask courts to issue permanent injunctions to halt rivals from infringing on their patents.
Currently, patent owners have to file a new lawsuit every time a repeat offender infringes on a patent. Small, family-owned businesses often can’t afford to repeatedly go after these thieves.
The STRONGER Patents Act would also rein in the notorious Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This branch of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office exists to review patents that are allegedly too broad and vague. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has gone out of its way to strike down patents, even ones that courts have found legitimate. It has partly or completely invalidated patents in 84 percent of its final written decisions.
The STRONGER Patents Act would check this practice by giving federal courts the final say on a patent’s validity. So if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision differs from that of the court, the court’s ruling will win.
These reforms would encourage investment in intellectual-property-intensive businesses. Three-quarters of investors weigh the value of small companies’ patents when deciding whether or not to back them.
Passing the STRONGER Patents Act would give innovative family businesses the confidence they need to make investments that boost our economy.
Dick Patten is president of the American Business Defense Foundation. He is a baronial surety in the Baronial Order of the Magna Charta.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “The STRONGER Patents Act will boost family businesses”
Congress must protect vital drug patents from Wall Street’s inter partes review attacks
