Avoid politicians who advocate democracy
By Harold Pease
In electoral contests today, almost everyone in both major political parties advocates democracy. But the Founding Fathers ran from that word as fast as they could, advocating instead a republic. We need to do the same if we really understand liberty. Those using the term “democracy” either intentionally use the term to undermine individual liberty or show themselves as ignorant of the basics of our government. In either case, we are wise to avoid politicians who advocate democracy in favor of candidates rejecting democracy.
Given our continual drift from a republic to a democracy, it might be well to review what historical philosophies most favored democracy as a form of government. The Founding Fathers and the socialists were total opposites on the word “democracy” — one distained it, the other loved it.
Of those who favored democracy, the most blunt was Karl Marx, the father of communism (the most violent form of socialism).
He wrote, “Democracy is the road to socialism,” implying that one cannot have socialism without first having democracy.
Vladimir Lenin, the socialist revolutionary bringing it to Russia, agreed. In his 1905 work, “Two Tactics of Social Democracy,” he saw democracy as a strategy leading to his desired socialist revolution. “Social-Democracy, however, wants … to develop the class struggle of the proletariat to the point where the latter will take the leading part in the popular Russian revolution, i.e., will lead this revolution to the democratic-dictatorship of the proletariat and the peasantry.”
In a letter to Inessa Armand in 1916, he added, “We Social-Democrats always stand for democracy, not ‘in the name of capitalism,’ but in the name of clearing the path for our movement, which clearing is impossible without the development of capitalism.” Class conflict and the philosophy of “share the wealth” were, and remain, central to the empowerment of communism.
Those who abhorred democracy, as far as we are able to ascertain, included all the Founding Fathers.
Benjamin Franklin wrote in 1759, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”
Years later, when Franklin exited the Constitutional Convention, a woman inquired of him, “What form of government have you left us?” the brilliant Franklin answered, “A republic, if you can keep it.” The phrase expressed some doubt as to whether man could understand the value of a republic enough to protect it from becoming a democracy.
So what is wrong with democracy?
James Madison, the father of the Constitution, wrote in his Federalist Paper No. 10, “In a pure democracy, there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.”
Thomas Jefferson agreed but was more blunt: “A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.” On another occasion, he reasoned that the republic would “cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
Alexander Hamilton, Jefferson’s supposed political archrival, saw it similarly: “We are now forming a republican form of government. Real Liberty is not found in the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments. If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy, or some other form of dictatorship.”
Now we understand why the word “democracy” is not found in any of our original founding documents, not even in our Pledge of Allegiance. Our system, a republic, protects us from the less informed masses, which is always the majority. This is why, until the perversion of the Constitution by the 17th Amendment, the state legislature selected their two U.S. Senators — not the people. This is why the Electoral College selects the president and why the people have no voice in the selection of Supreme Court members.
If one were to call this undemocratic, the Founding Fathers would agree. Their review of history showed them that democracy in Athens and Rome led to tyranny by the majority that then destroyed liberty in both places.
Recent census reports show that about half of our adult population pay no federal income tax. When that number exceeds 50 percent, we will join the fallen republics of Athens and Rome with their “bread and circuses” as examples of the majority voting to feed their wants from those who produce. When the “rich” are destroyed by socialism — as they were in the former USSR — and cannot provide the customary free stuff any more, the majority, who came to believe that it was owed to them, take to the streets in anger. The majority will then vote for whatever tyrant promises them security. This historical record is clear.
This is why socialists and communists loved democracy and the Founding Fathers decidedly did not!
Alexis de Tocqueville, a visiting French philosopher in 1840, is alleged to have told us when our republic would fall. “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the ‘public’s’ money.”
That day is today. Both parties must return to the Constitution that preserves the republic or we will lose both the republic and the Constitution. A good start is to avoid politicians who advocate democracy.
Articles related to “Avoid politicians who advocate democracy”
Dixie State University offers new degree program in political corruption
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
