Will the Green New Deal work? Ask California.
By Robert C. Lapsley
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey just outlined their estimated $93 trillion plan for a Green New Deal. It aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in only a decade by transitioning to renewable energy sources.
While it has a catchy name, the Green New Deal isn’t much of a “deal” at all. Here in California, aspects of the Green New Deal have substantially slowed housing construction, robbing California’s lower- and middle-class families of the wealth accumulation they might achieve through homeownership and forcing many state residents to live farther from work while simultaneously increasing the price they pay for gas and increasing GHG emissions.
According to data compiled by the California Center for Jobs and the Economy, average annual electricity bills for California residents are up $236 since 2010, when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 was fully implemented. While costs are up, we haven’t seen the types of job growth promised by the deal’s proponents. In fact, most “green jobs” are the result of simply reclassifying existing jobs.
This makes it especially ironic that state regulators are doing their best to take natural-gas power plants offline across the state. Last year, state leaders committed California to a 60-percent renewable energy target by 2030 — and zero emissions by 2045.
We must have an affordable and reliable energy supply. Keeping California’s lights on requires a grid that can ramp-up electricity generation at high-demand times, and quickly supply energy to those who need it.
That is why a diversified energy portfolio, including natural gas, is so important to the state’s energy future. Natural gas creates electricity that can be dispatched quickly by plant operators.
The same can’t be said about wind and solar — as both rely on natural elements that are impossible to predict.
Consider last summer’s heatwave. On July 6, energy demand peaked from about 5pm to 7pm at 45,000 megawatts, according to a Manhattan Institute scholar.
However, wind-energy production had peaked at around 12am that morning and solar was at its highest around 1:25pm. By 10pm, when electricity demand was still abnormally high at 40,000 megawatts, solar production and wind generation stood at zero and 2,700 megawatts, respectively.
This is why many Californians are now subject to Time-of-Day rates, paying more for electricity during peak hours, when solar and wind production is non-existent. As California officials continue to push for more gas-fired plant closures, which used to provide power during these demand spikes, costs will continue to increase for working Californians across the state.
Between 2017 and 2018, California’s natural-gas power-generation capacity decreased. This drop-off put the state and our economy at “increased risk” of power shortages, according to California’s grid operator.
Of course, proponents of California’s move toward renewables maintain that batteries are the key to making wind and solar more reliable. But the mass energy-storage technologies they have in mind simply don’t exist.
Here’s a better idea: provide residents with the lowest-cost choices for power they need to keep their homes livable and their costs affordable.
Stop talking about the unrealistic Green New Deal and let’s start talking about a realistic energy future that harnesses everything we have — sun, wind, and fuels like natural gas — to provide the most reliable and lowest-cost energy for not just California, but the entire nation.
Robert C. Lapsley is president of the California Business Roundtable, a non-partisan organization comprising the senior executive leadership of the major employers throughout the state with a combined workforce of more than half a million employees.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “Will the Green New Deal work? Ask California.”
The Green New Deal is proof that environmentalists can’t do math
