Quid Pro Joe
We’re clearly on a path where the federal government confiscates increasing percentages of our earnings and doles them back out to citizens according to how the political winds are blowing each year.

Biden’s Entitlement Blowout

Quid Pro Joe – By Howard Sierer –

Pres. Biden’s American Families Plan proposes to extend federal entitlements to an additional 21 million Americans, putting over half of all working-age American households on the dole for the first time in history. Once enacted, it will be a political impossibility to pare any of them back, much less repeal them, no matter how costly, flawed or ineffective they turn out to be.

Unlike traditional federal expenditures, entitlement program spending is open-ended. Any individual or entity meeting certain qualifications is “entitled” to receive prescribed federal benefits. Quid Pro Joe

Today’s major entitlement programs are familiar: Social Security, disability insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, college student loans and grants, food stamps, unemployment insurance, Obamacare. The list goes on to more specialized entitlements: farm subsidies, the Export-Import Bank, veterans’ services, and many others. With the notable exception of Obamacare, each was popular when enacted and unsurprisingly, most continue to enjoy widespread support from their benefit recipients.

All these federal entitlement programs were enacted with noble intent. Almost all have been irresponsibly expanded by Congress and their costs have ballooned far beyond original projections.

Medicaid was once a safety-net program but now covers 37% of Californians. Food stamps and nutrition programs started as help for the poor but now covers 42 million Americans. Medicare started as coverage for seniors but now the Democratic Party wants it to cover everyone over age 55. Quid Pro Joe

Autopilot spending on these open-ended programs plus interest on the national debt already totals over two-thirds of the federal budget and continues to grow in both dollars and as a percentage. Our federal government is becoming an insurance company with an army.

On top of this already uncontrolled spending, progressive Democrats now propose to add another $2.5 trillion. Examples:

  • Free community college tuition for all regardless of family income
  • Daycare costs for preschoolers; a family with two children and up to $130,000 in income would qualify
  • Federal wage subsidies for up to 12 weeks of time for care of newborns or sick family members
  • Health insurance subsidies that in some cases would apply to families with incomes over $200,000

Shockingly, working-age households in the upper half of income distributions would receive 40% of the new entitlement benefits. Don’t expect to read that in the liberal media.

Congressional Democrats propose to use a familiar pattern of making what were billed as emergency programs permanent. Emergency responses to the pandemic such as Obamacare subsidies and refundable tax credits for child care, passed in March of this year, were sold as temporary measures. A month later, Biden proposed to make them permanent.

While the administration claims its plan will cost $1.8 trillion, the far more reliable Penn Wharton Budget Model predicts it will actually cost taxpayers $2.5 trillion. And even these numbers are achieved only by Democrats’ tongue-in-cheek budget projections that a number of the benefits will end after five years. History shows they’ll never end.

More shenanigans are used to explain how this all will be funded. “Make the rich pay their fair share” is the standard canard when Congressional Democrats want to spend. But the top 1% of individual taxpayers already pay 40% of federal income tax while the top 25% pay over 87%. The bottom 50% pay only 2.4%.

How about raising corporate income taxes? There’s no better way to drive manufacturing and R&D offshore. Bottom line: Congressional Democrats expect the Federal Reserve will continue printing money to cover it all.

In years past when dramatic new entitlement spending programs were proposed – Johnson’s Great Society and Obama’s eponymous Obamacare – Democrats held substantial majorities in Congress. In those situations, they could claim a mandate for change.

Today’s Senate is split 50-50 and Democrats’ nine-seat House majority is the slimmest majority held by either party in 88 years. This is no mandate for anything other than what Biden promised during his campaign for office and what he was saying up until inauguration day: reaching across the aisle for a bipartisan approach to government.

Instead, we find Congressional Democrats proposing programs explicitly intended to make the middle-class dependent on government handouts.

When will this stop? While progressives will deny it, it’s clear they’ve embraced Karl Marx’s slogan, “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

We’re clearly on a path where the federal government confiscates increasing percentages of our earnings and doles them back out to citizens according to how the political winds are blowing each year.

Welcome to the “democratic socialism” that Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and their radical-left fellow travelers espouse. Not to worry: Big Brother in Washington DC has your best interests at heart.


Viewpoints and perspectives expressed throughout The Independent are those of the individual contributors. They do not necessarily reflect those held by the staff of The Independent or our advertising sponsors. Your comments, rebuttals, and contributions are welcome in accordance with our Terms of Service. Please be respectful and abide by our Community Rules. If you have privacy concerns you can view our Privacy Policy here. Thank you! 

Click here to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or a Letter to the Editor

Southern Utah Advertising Rates
Advertise with The Independent of Southern Utah, we're celebrating 25 years in print!

 

Click This Ad

4 COMMENTS

  1. Jeez Howard. I made it all the way to your paragraph of “entitlements”. First on your list was Social Security. Dang it, I didn’t realize I had to pay into that program for almost 40 years before I could get my entitement! Why didn’t you let me know that I didn’t have to pay all these years! All I had to do was get old, and then demand my “Social Security Entitlement.”
    Same old incorrect BS that the reactionary right has been spounting since the time of President Roosevelt.

    Won’t even bother to mention the rest of your rant…

    • Mr. Miller is wrong again, in this case 61 years wrong, using the same reasoning that failed Ephraim Nestor, a Bulgarian communist in 1960. The Supreme Court ruled in Flemming vs. Nestor that Social Security benefits are NOT “an earned right.” In the Social Security Administration’s own words, Social Security benefits are “like all federal entitlement programs.” https://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html

      Further, the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) deductions from earnings are NOT contributions to a retirement program but are a “federal payroll tax.” https://www.ssa.gov/thirdparty/materials/pdfs/educators/What-is-FICA-Infographic-EN-05-10297.pdf

      Correcting MIller’s factual errors is getting old. He needs to do his homework before he embarrasses himself again. And who knows, he might even learn something if he read the rest of my column.

  2. So here we have an educated man who had a professional job with undoubtedly a nice salary. He is whining about all these entitlement programs and Democrats giving away our (his) money to fund all of these programs.

    So Howard, you must be aware of IQ curves. Check the left side of any of them and you will find that about 16% of the US population has an IQ of 85 or less. That works out to 52 million of our population of 325 million. If they can find a job at all, it is likely that they work for minimum wage. At full time employment they make about $1,200/ month. Probably can’t afford to rent even a one bedroom apartment here in St. George.

    According to the government, one in 4 U.S. adults – 61 million Americans – have a disability that impacts their major life activities (such as holding down a job), according to the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Gets worse as people age. What kind of jobs and salary do they earn, eh?

    So my point sir. What do you (and society as a whole) want to do with these people? Sounds like you want to cut them off at the knees because you are upset with all those “socialistic entitlement programs” that the bogeymen leftist Democrats support. What comes to mind is that famous quote… “Let them eat cake.”

    Perhaps a bit of empathy and/or sympathy would enrich your life.
    Dr. Rick Miller PhD

  3. Love the exchange in the comment section of this article – not taking sides. Always wondered about my German stamps from the 1930s with million mark denominations when I was in grade school. Was not until I was in my 20s that I learned about the Weimar Republic era of hyper inflation and put 2 & 2 together. My IQ was 134- messed me up as I ended up skipping 2 grades and paid the price for it in Highschool being the youngest in my class. Sucked royally. IQ tests can be detrimental. Sincerely Fulcanelli. PHD in Foolmanship.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here