CNN vs. President Trump: They’re both wrong
By Rich Manieri
If you haven’t heard, or just don’t care, which would be understandable, CNN is suing the Trump administration.
The nonsense started last week when CNN’s White House correspondent and boil on the president’s posterior Jim Acosta once again made a spectacle of himself at a press conference. President Trump then revoked Acosta’s press credentials.
This is one of those fights where it’s difficult to manufacture a rooting interest.
In one corner, you have a petulant, agenda-driven reporter who continues to violate one of the basic tenets of news reporting by making himself the story.
In the other corner, you have a thin-skinned president who will always take whatever chum Acosta tosses into the water. And Acosta knows it.
This is not about fact finding or searching for truth, which is what journalism is supposed to be about. Instead, this is about Acosta deliberately creating a scene so CNN will have something to obsess over for the next week.
Of course, the president has the pulpit and the opportunity to defuse such situations. But as we know, Trump is not a defuser. He’s a teetering drum of kerosene surrounded by burning embers.
If you haven’t already chosen a side in this ridiculous schoolyard scrap, I have a suggestion. Don’t bother. They’re both wrong.
First, let’s deal with Acosta.
He used his time with the White House microphone last week to filibuster about the migrant caravan.
“You’ve said this caravan was an ‘invasion,'” Acosta began. “As you know Mr. President, the caravan was not an invasion.”
Trump then attempted to cut off Acosta, who kept going.
“May I ask one other question?”
Another question? I must have missed the first one.
At that point, a poor White House intern jumped in and tried to grab the microphone from Acosta, who wouldn’t go down without a fight.
Then, instead of moving on and refusing to give Acosta the attention he so desperately wanted, Trump couldn’t help himself.
“CNN should be ashamed of itself having you working for them,” Trump said, as he pointed his finger at Acosta. “You are a rude, terrible person and you shouldn’t be working for CNN.”
Such a scene would be funny it wasn’t so pathetic.
Yes, a reporter has the right to challenge the president. And it’s not uncommon for a White House correspondent to ask a follow up question or two. But there is such a thing as decorum. A credential doesn’t give you the right to be rude or belligerent, much like buying a ticket to a football game doesn’t give you the right to throw a beer bottle onto the field. And Acosta isn’t the only reporter in the room with questions.
Nevertheless, this has worked out swimmingly for Acosta. Not only is he now a big story but he has forged his way into the realm of journalistic martyrdom.
Which is one reason why Trump shouldn’t have taken his credentials away.
Trump has now turned Acosta into a sympathetic figure, a champion of free speech and protector of the people’s right to know.
“The White House has violated CNN and @Acosta’s First Amendment rights of freedom of the press and Fifth Amendment rights to due process,” CNN tweeted Tuesday.
And there’s the story, front and center, on cnn.com.
“CNN sues President Trump and top White House aides for barring Jim Acosta.”
Let the 24/7 panel discussion begin.
The president also can’t ban journalists because they’re annoying. Part of a reporter’s job is to be annoying and to ask difficult, uncomfortable questions. We need an adversarial press which, by the way, was mostly supine during the Obama presidency. But acting like a jerk and wasting everyone’s time is not part of the job description.
I get it. These two don’t like each other. It happens. As Jerry Seinfeld once observed, “Not everybody likes everybody.”
But Trump and Acosta have more in common than their disdain for each other and their inability to recognize the high road if they were glued to it.
The conduct of both men, in front of the viewing world, was cringeworthy.
We talk a lot about the deteriorating level of political discourse in this country. In this case, both men had an opportunity to advance the dialogue. Instead, they made themselves part of the problem.
The viewpoints expressed above are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Independent.
How to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or letter to the editor to The Independent
Do you have something to say? Want your voice to be heard by thousands of readers? Send The Independent your letter to the editor or guest opinion piece. All submissions will be considered for publication by our editorial staff. If your letter or editorial is accepted, it will run on suindependent.com, and we’ll promote it through all of our social media channels. We may even decide to include it in our monthly print edition. Just follow our simple submission guidelines and make your voice heard:
—Submissions should be between 300 and 1,500 words.
—Submissions must be sent to editor@infowest.com as a .doc, .docx, .txt, or .rtf file.
—The subject line of the email containing your submission should read “Letter to the editor.”
—Attach your name to both the email and the document file (we don’t run anonymous letters).
—If you have a photo or image you’d like us to use and it’s in .jpg format, at least 1200 X 754 pixels large, and your intellectual property (you own the copyright), feel free to attach it as well, though we reserve the right to choose a different image.
—If you are on Twitter and would like a shout-out when your piece or letter is published, include that in your correspondence and we’ll give you a mention at the time of publication.
Articles related to “CNN vs. President Trump: They’re both wrong”
Mainstream media vs. alternative media in the Clinton/Trump election
