Wild animals are not pets

Wild animals are not pets. Besides the harm that could occur to wild animals kept in homes, keeping wildlife as pets poses great danger to humans.
Wild animals are not pets. Besides the harm that could occur to wild animals kept in homes, keeping wildlife as pets poses a great danger to humans.

By Terry Messmer

A woman in New York paid $1,800 for a 9-week-old black leopard. She thought it was cute and friendly until it attacked her.

A Pennsylvania woman died after being attacked by her “pet,” a 350-pound black bear she had raised since it was a cub.

A red fox pup was turned into a shelter by a family that had kept it in captivity. The fox became blind because it was not being fed properly.

These are examples of people who attempted to make pets out of wildlife, and the unfortunate situations are not isolated.

 

Besides the harm that could occur to wild animals kept in homes, keeping wildlife as pets pose a great danger to humans. Born Free USA, a nonprofit advocacy organization that strives to end the ownership of wild animals, has documented over 1,500 attacks, including 75 human deaths involving wildlife pets since 1990.

In most states, private ownership of wildlife is illegal. These laws exist because wild animals have special needs, and it is difficult to keep them healthy and alive in captivity. Proper nutrition is essential for normal development, and any deficiencies may cost the animal its life.

Unlike domesticated cats and dogs, keeping a wild animal in a home or raising it by hand since a newborn does not make it a pet. It remains a wild animal.

Humans have bred dogs, cats, cattle, sheep, and other livestock for as long as the last 10,000 to 15,000 years. Domestication is a process that occurs over many generations of animals. Through domestication, over time, undesirable traits are bred out of a species. Even then, the animals often retain the ability to maim and kill. Four and half million people are still bitten by domesticated dogs each year in the United States.

Wild animals may carry zoonotic diseases that can be transmitted to people and pets. Some of these, such as rabies, can be lethal to humans. Wild animals can carry the same diseases that some of our pets are susceptible to, such as distemper. But unlike pets, wild animals are not vaccinated for diseases or dewormed, nor do they see a veterinarian regularly. Consequently, the infectious diseases and parasites a wild animal may carry can be harmful to both people and pets.

Given these risks, it brings to question why someone would purposely take an animal from the wild and keep it captive.

Ignorance about the perils associated with the wild pets, curiosity about wildlife, love of animals, ego, novelty, or perhaps even profit provides some reasons. The most frequent reason is when people rescue orphans and decide to raise them. However, a captive wild animal is essentially a prisoner caught between its instincts and its dependence on humans to survive.

As a captive animal grows independent of its caretakers, it may become aggressive, frustrated or may bite, leading to injury or death. It has not had thousands of years to overcome wild instincts as domesticated animals have. The animal may escape, it may be let go in the wild, or it may be brought to a wildlife rehabilitator. By this time, it may be too late to teach it survival skills or appropriate social behavior for its species.

Some wild animals are not protected under Utah state law, meaning you do not have to possess a valid hunting or trapping license to harvest them. Wild animals, like raccoons and coyotes, require a permit to house them in captivity. The importation, distribution, relocation, holding in captivity, or possession of live coyotes and live raccoons in Utah is prohibited.

Unpermitted wild animals may be seized immediately by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Department of Health, the Department of Agriculture and Food, animal control officers, or peace officers. If you have an illegally held wild animal, your best course of action is to contact one of the agencies mentioned or a licensed wildlife rehabilitator. They can determine if the animal can be re-socialized with its own kind and forage for itself. A wild animal that has been raised by humans has not been properly prepared for life in the wild. To release a captive wild animal is almost certainly dooming it to suffer starvation, unnatural predation, accident, or an unfortunate contact with humans it might see as friendly.

If you want a pet, consider this. Of the 3 million cats and dogs that are euthanized in shelters each year, most are healthy and treatable and could have been adopted into new homes.

For more information, visit wildawareutah.org.

Terry Messmer is a Utah State University Extension wildlife specialist.


Viewpoints and perspectives expressed throughout The Independent are those of the individual contributors. They do not necessarily reflect those held by the staff of The Independent or our advertising sponsors. Your comments, rebuttals, and contributions are welcome in accordance with our Terms of Service. Please be respectful and abide by our Community Rules. If you have privacy concerns you can view our Privacy Policy here. Thank you! 

Click here to submit an article, guest opinion piece, or a Letter to the Editor

Southern Utah Advertising Rates
Advertise with The Independent of Southern Utah, we're celebrating 25 years in print!

 

Cougar sightings on the rise, follow these tips to prevent cougar attacks

Be a responsible recreator in Utah’s outdoors

Living in snake country: Six things to consider

Click This Ad

1 COMMENT

  1. On the other hand, in the care of a responsible, knowledgeable caretaker, ‘exotic’ animals can make excellent ‘pets’, and thrive in a captive environment. Born Free USA is not a reliable source of information about responsible ownership of exotic animals because they philosophically oppose owning animals, and have an agenda to protect. They are in the same category as other ainmal rights groups like PETA and the Humane Society of the US. As far as danger goes, the vast majority of the danger is to the caretaker, who has willingly chosen to have the animal, not the general public. In the case of big cats, the so-called ‘pet’ owners actually have the best safety record with these animals, by a significant margin. It is major zoos who have most of the incidents because they are hands-off with their animals, and have elaborate exhibits that tend to have inherent safety issues. There are caretaker organizations out there for the exotic animal owner, such as the Feline Conservation Foundation. Their membership includes everything from ‘Pet’ owners to professional zookeepers, all who have the desire to see all of the wild feline species conserved. For a look at the positive side of exotic animal ownership, plus carefully vetted statistics showing the minimal danger these animals actually pose, check out REXANO.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here